Standards

Standards establish reference criteria for systems that interact with Human Capacity. They create a basis for asking not only whether a system achieves its own objective, but how it distributes demand, support, access, friction and developmental consequences f

MEASUREMENT

Standards

Standards establish criteria for how institutions, environments and other systems should interact with Human Capacity.

Indexes tell us what is happening to Human Capacity. Standards address what systems should be expected to do once those relationships can be seen.

The Initiative’s standards work begins from the premise that Human Capacity is not an unlimited resource available for institutions to extract. Organizations and systems have legitimate objectives, but those objectives do not erase the human costs through which they are achieved.

A workplace can pursue productivity. A school can pursue learning. A government can administer law and public services. A healthcare institution can deliver care. A technology can optimize a defined interaction. Standards add the human side of the equation: what does the system require from humans, what capacities does it support or develop, what burdens does it create, what does it allow people to recover, and what costs does it transfer outside its own accounting?

There is no reason to assume that one standard should govern every human-world relationship. Employment, education, healthcare, public administration, technology, physical environments and other systems interact with humans differently.

The Initiative therefore treats Standards as an evergreen programme. Specific standards can be developed for different interfaces while drawing from a common science of Human Capacity, functional requirements, support, accessibility, recovery, development, alignment and capacity externalities.

Capacity-compatible systems do not have to eliminate effort, difficulty, ambition or challenge. Development itself often requires demand. The question is whether demands are meaningful and proportionate, whether adequate recovery and support exist, and whether the system’s success depends on degrading or chronically consuming capacities the person needs across the rest of life.

A role or institution may have a measurable required profile. Standards provide a way to ask whether that requirement is intrinsic to the function or merely produced by the design of the institution. This prevents Human Profiles from becoming a tool for endlessly adapting humans to whatever demands systems choose to impose.

Evidence & measurementReference criterionSystem design / operationMonitoringRevision

Evidence & scientific lineage

International Organization for Standardization. ISO 9241-210:2019 interactive systems. ISO — 9241-210

COSMIN. Selecting the most suitable outcome measurement instrument. Guidance on content validity, internal consistency and evaluation of measurement properties. COSMIN — Selecting a measurement instrument